The Resistance Hub
DISCLAIMER: Links included might be affiliate links. If you purchase a product or service with the links that I provide I may receive a small commission. There is no additional charge to you.
It’s appropriate to reflect on some historical precedents for post-conflict transition of power so we don’t repeat past mistakes. Some examples of successful and unsuccessful transitions paired with the core lessons can be found below:
1. Iraq (2003–2011): The Dangers of Power Vacuums
The U.S.-led invasion of Iraq dismantled the Ba’athist regime, similar to the Assad regime in Syria. The rapid de-Ba’athification left a void in governance, contributing to a sectarian civil war and the rise of extremist groups like ISIS.
Lesson: A hasty transition without an inclusive political framework can exacerbate instability.
2. Libya (2011–Present): Fragmentation Post-Gaddafi
After the fall of Muammar Gaddafi, competing factions struggled to fill the power vacuum. The lack of a unified transition plan led to prolonged conflict and the entrenchment of militias.
Lesson: Disjointed opposition coalitions can result in protracted instability and external interference.
3. Lebanon (1975–1990): Sectarianism and Power Sharing
Lebanon’s civil war ended with the Taif Agreement, establishing a sectarian-based power-sharing system. However, this system institutionalized divisions, creating long-term governance challenges.
Lesson: While power-sharing can stabilize a fractured society, it risks cementing sectarian divides.
4. Afghanistan (1989–2001): The Role of Foreign Actors
Following the Soviet withdrawal, competing factions, supported by foreign powers, plunged Afghanistan into chaos. External influence often prolonged conflict and prevented national reconciliation.
Lesson: Regional and global powers must align to avoid prolonging Syria’s instability.
5. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1992–1995): International Mediation
The Dayton Accords ended the Bosnian War by imposing a complex peace agreement backed by NATO and the UN.
Lesson: Strong international mediation and peacekeeping forces may be necessary to ensure stability.
6. Yemen (2011–Present): Political Negotiations and Fragmentation
After Ali Abdullah Saleh’s resignation, competing factions and external interference led to prolonged conflict.
Lesson: A lack of a comprehensive political settlement and persistent regional rivalries can hinder peace.
Relevance to Syria
1. Power Vacuum Risks: A unified and representative transitional authority is essential to prevent extremist groups from exploiting instability.
2. Sectarian and Ethnic Tensions: Syria’s diverse population (Alawites, Sunnis, Kurds) requires an inclusive political framework to avoid renewed conflict.
3. External Interference: The involvement of powers like Russia, Iran, Turkey, and the U.S. will likely shape the post-Assad era. Coordinated diplomacy is critical to avoid proxy conflicts.
4. Reconstruction and Reconciliation: Addressing war crimes and rebuilding community trust will be vital for long-term peace.
Ultimately, Syria’s future depends on inclusive governance, international cooperation, and avoiding repeating historical mistakes seen in post-conflict transitions elsewhere.
Stay Up To Date By Reviewing These Articles
1. “Assad’s Opponents Are Building a New Order” – The Atlantic (December 9, 2024)
This article delves into the diverse factions now controlling various regions of Syria, including Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), the Southern Operations Room, the U.S.-backed Syrian Free Army, the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), and the Turkish-backed Syrian National Army (SNA). It discusses their efforts to collaborate despite historical conflicts and external pressures, particularly from Turkey. The piece also highlights HTS’s initiatives to establish credible state institutions and the importance of cooperation among Syria’s diverse ethnic and sectarian communities for a successful transition.
2. “A Long Road Ahead to Decide Syria’s Future After Rapid End to Assad’s Rule” – Associated Press (December 9, 2024)
This report examines the challenges Syria faces in establishing a decentralized, pluralistic government following Assad’s ousting. It emphasizes the country’s fragmentation among various factions, including U.S.-backed Kurdish forces and remnants of the former regime, and the potential influence of foreign powers like Russia, Iran, Turkey, the U.S., and Israel. The article underscores concerns about potential sectarian violence and the complexities of integrating displaced citizens and diverse ethnic groups into a cohesive governance structure.
3. “The Times View on Syria’s New Leaders: After Assad” – The Times (December 9, 2024)
This editorial discusses the international community’s apprehension regarding Syria’s new leaders, particularly HTS and its leader Abu Mohammad al-Julani, who have al-Qaeda affiliations. It questions HTS’s commitment to tolerance and pragmatism, especially concerning minority rights, and stresses the necessity for the new leadership to genuinely address the populace’s needs to foster stability and trust, moving away from autocratic and extremist approaches.
4. “After 13 Years of War, Bashar al-Assad’s Regime in Syria Has Been Defeated. What Comes Next?” – Vox (December 8, 2024)
This article reflects on the end of Assad’s 13-year rule, marked by severe repression and a devastating civil war. It explores the rebels’ promises to avoid vengeance and maintain the current Prime Minister until a transitional government is formed. The piece also considers the U.S.‘s cautious stance due to the extremist affiliations of some rebel groups and the broader implications for Syria’s future stability, particularly concerning chemical weapons and the fate of Kurdish forces.
5. “Demise of the Butcher of Damascus Welcome, but Chaos Looms” – The Australian (December 8, 2024)
This analysis focuses on the regional power dynamics following Assad’s fall, noting the rapid offensive by Islamist rebel groups led by HTS and the subsequent power vacuum. It discusses the potential for further instability, drawing parallels to the rise of groups like the Islamic State, and examines the roles of regional players such as Turkey and Israel in the evolving situation.